Rank Your Endorsements

A guide to maximizing the power of your organization’s endorsements in ranked-choice races.

What is a ranked endorsement?

Typically, an organization (or a person) that endorses candidates recommends its favorite candidate in accordance with its rules for endorsement. Ranked Choice Voting provides exciting opportunities to maximize your power and influence more candidates to support your platform.

Under Ranked Choice Voting, an organization has the option to rank a slate of candidates in order of preference. As an organization, you indicate your favorite, or first-choice, candidate in accordance with your screening criteria and a second and additional (backup) choices if you wish. Second and lower choices only count if/when your first choice is eliminated.

Why is it beneficial to rank endorse rather than endorse a single candidate? 

Under RCV, voters have the option to rank candidates in order of preference. In turn, organizations have the opportunity to provide voters their preferred ranked slate of candidates. In doing so, you’re letting your members and supporters know how you prefer they fill out their ranked ballot. In the event your first-choice candidate is eliminated, your set of rankings informs voters who to mark as their second choice, increasing the chances that your second preference will be elected. If your second preference is eliminated, your third choice preference will count, and so forth. In sum, it gives you the opportunity to influence how your supporters or members will vote.  

Are all endorsements created equal?

No. Your number one choice is the most important endorsement and only this candidate has the right to claim your organization’s first-choice endorsement. The second or third choice candidates must not claim your endorsement without indicating their ranking. This would be false advertisement of support. 

Organizations providing ranked endorsements should require candidates to pledge to a code of conduct, for example:  

ENDORSEMENTS:

I pledge to report endorsements of my campaign accurately. My campaign communications will only list endorsements from organizations and individuals that have formally agreed to endorse my campaign. When my endorsements come with a particular ranking, I will indicate that specific level of support in any of my communications about my endorsements.

Example: If endorsed by former Mayor John Doe as his 3rd choice, I will list his endorsement as "John Doe (#3 choice)". If endorsed by John Doe as his 1st choice, I will list his endorsement as “John Doe (#1 choice)”.

RANKED CHOICE VOTING:

I pledge that my campaign will not ask voters to give me more than one ranking or to rank only me on the ballot. I recognize that such strategies do not increase my chances of winning.

How do organizations support their ranked candidates?

As you would under the traditional system of endorsing a single candidate, you would typically provide financial and organizational support to only your first-choice candidate to maximize the chances that your preferred candidate wins. 

We look forward to robust, competitive, and civil campaigns across the various races in Minneapolis and St. Paul this year and applaud the organizations engaging and supporting candidates in the important work of making the Twin Cities a better place for all its citizens.   

Using RCV to vote on your endorsements

RCV isn’t just a powerful tool to maximize your endorsements’ power. It can also be used by organizations that endorse using membership votes.

Proportional RCV and Sequential RCV: two ways to hold endorsement votes

When endorsing multiple candidates, either in a multi-winner race or in producing a ranked endorsement slate for a single-winner race, there are two variations of RCV that can be used.

Proportional RCV: Proportional RCV works for endorsements in a similar way it works for elections. When a candidate passes the win threshold ( 1 ÷ ( 1 + # of seats available ) ), they are endorsed. The first candidate to pass the threshold is endorsed as the first choice, the second candidate as the second choice, and so on. As with all Proportional RCV contests, any excess in votes received by a winning candidate are transferred to those voters’ second choices. This system works best for endorsement slates where the endorsements need to best reflect the overall views of the membership.

Sequential RCV: This variation of RCV is best for organizations who want to be sure that there is broad membership support for each of the endorsed candidates on a slate. What makes Sequential RCV different is that when a voter’s first-choice candidate wins, their entire vote continues to count for their second choice. And if their second-choice candidate wins, their entire vote transfers to their third choice, and so on. Under this system, a majority group of voters at an organization would be able to control the entire endorsed slate.

Which variation of RCV should my organization choose?

As stated above, Proportional RCV works best when it is important that the overall views of the entire membership need to be reflected and Sequential RCV works best when majority support for each endorsed candidate is needed. Generally, organizations will prefer to use Sequential RCV to ensure that each endorsed candidate on the ranked slate reflects the views of a majority of its members.

Case Studies

Examples of Endorsements under RCV

There are several organizations in Minnesota that have already experimented with multi-candidate endorsements, ranked and otherwise. For example, TakeAction Minnesota endorsed two Minneapolis mayoral candidates in 2021, while the Sierra Club took it one step further by ranking their top two choices for a Bloomington City Council seat. There are a number of other examples from across the country of organizations that have used ranked and other multi-candidate endorsements to great effect. As one of the first adopters of RCV, New York City in particular has seen a large number of organizations release multi-candidate endorsements.

  1. The Working Families Party endorses a slate of candidates in races like the New York City mayoral race. In 2025, the organization has endorsed four candidates, and encourages voters to rank them all. They don’t go as far to suggest a ranking order, and instead ask voters to determine their own rankings based on personal preference.

  2. The Professional Staff Congress CUNY labor union, which represents faculty and staff at the City University of New York, has done a mix of single-candidate endorsements, ranked endorsements, and tiered slates.